Reprocessing of magnetic data for Yukon was performed between November 2016 and March 2017. Aeromagnetic data were compiled, data of different resolutions were merged, and a series of images individually levelled for each map sheet were produced. For each 250k-scale map, the following magnetic derivative maps were produced: 1. Residual Total Magnetic Field; 2. Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic Field (RTP); 3. First Vertical Derivative of the Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic Field (RTP_VD); and 4. Tilt Derivative of the Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic Field (RTP_TDR). These maps are provided as pdfs, geotiffs and Geosoft grid files. Colour ramps/legends are provided for each map.

Aurora Geosciences Ltd was contracted to perform a review of publicly available digital magnetic geophysical data submitted with assessment reports to develop standardized products and compilations. Data submitted prior to March 2015 were considered.Individual assessment report data were levelled and integrated with 1:250 000 compilations.Four gridded PDFs have been produced (residual total magnetic field, reduced to pole, vertical derivative and tilt derivative). Original 250k geophysical data can be found in YGS Open File 2017-37.

The land classification shown is derived from in-field investigation and is only undertaken for project investigation purposes. These polygons represent the most accurate and up-to-date information regarding agriculture land conditions at those specific locations.Distributed from [[GeoYukon](.underline)](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [[Government of Yukon](.underline)](https://yukon.ca/maps) .Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [[geomatics.help@yukon.ca](.underline)](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

not_specified

Detailed surficial geology mapping (1:15 000 scale) was carried out from 2022-2024 for the area surrounding the Village of Haines Junction in southwestern Yukon, within the Traditional Territory of the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations. Mapping was based on desktop interpretations of high-resolution lidar, as well as air photo and satellite imagery. This was further supported by a variety of field investigations including analysis of stratigraphic sections and geotechnical drill logs.The map portrays properties of surface sediments, including texture, genetic material, surface expression and stratigraphy. Geomorphological processes that presently modify surficial materials and/or did so in the past, are also identified. Some of these processes include geohazards such as landslides, permafrost thaw and flooding.A variety of landforms which indicate the presence of permafrost are mapped, including pingos, thermokarst collapse ponds, lithalsas and retrogressive thaw flow landslides. Locations of recent permafrost investigations are also shown, including geophysical surveys and shallow boreholes drilled to establish permafrost-monitoring stations.This work will ultimately support a variety of community activities, such as land use planning, archeological investigations, agricultural development, aggregate exploration, and infrastructure work. It also helps to better constrain the unique history of Neoglacial Lake Alsek, which inundated the area multiple times during recent advances of the Lowell Glacier across the Alsek River.

This map of the residual total magnetic field was derived from data acquired during an aeromagnetic survey carried out by Goldak Airborne Surveys during the period May 16, 2009 to July 1, 2009. The data were recorded using a split-beam cesium vapour magnetometer mounted in the tail boom of a Piper Navajo aircraft. The nominal traverse and control line spacings were 400 m and 2400 m, respectively, and the aircraft flew at a nominal terrain clearance of 150 m.

Game Management Areas (GMAs) are legal boundaries that define an area within which big game management objectives can be met through the setting of area-specific regulations. In other words, GMAs are used to manage Yukon wildlife species. GMAs are a combination of Game Management Zone (GMZ or Zone) and Game Management Subzone (GMS or Subzone). There are 443 GMAs in the Yukon which are grouped together into 11 Zones. In general, Zone boundaries follow highway centre lines and Subzone boundaries follow creeks and rivers. In effect, GMAs delineate mountain blocks, which reflects their original use as sheep management units. Despite this original intent, GMAs are now used to manage all species of Yukon wildlife. With the exception of National Parks, the entire Yukon is covered by GMAs. This data was built using the 1:250,000 National Topographic Data Base (NTDB) as the digitizing base.Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection.For more information: [geomatics.help@y](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)[ukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

The administration of coal projects in the Yukon is governed under the Territorial Lands (Yukon) Act (TLYA) and the Coal Regulations enabled under the TLYA. The land use permits necessary for coal exploration and development are issued by the Energy Mines and Resources Lands Branch under the TLYA. The remaining coal licenses and coal leases are issued and administered by the Mineral Resources Branch Mining Lands offices.Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection.For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

The purpose of this dataset is to provide quantitative analysis on specific commodities, offering insights into:- The total amount of specific commodities, e.g., Gold, in Yukon's hard rock deposits. - The highest-grade and largest deposits in Yukon. - The distribution of mineral resources within multiple zones in a deposit. - Source reports, direct links, and confidence levels for each mineral resource statement. - Differentiation between 43-101, JORC, and historical estimates. The resources in this dataset have been summarized and averaged to show the total geologic resource for a property or zone. For the exact numbers, please refer to the NI 43-101 compliant resource statement.+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Field\ | Description\ || \ | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Property\ | Property for which deposit || \ | resource was calculated.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Zone\ | Zone for which deposit resource || \ | was calculated.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| 43-101 Compliant\ | If the resource calculation is NI || \ | 43-101 compliant, JORC compliant, || | or historic.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Commodities\ | The types of commodities || \ | contained in the resource || | calculation, order is || | alphabetic.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Categories\ | The resource categories used to || \ | create the calculation. This || | indicates the level of certainty || | of the calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Resource / Reserve\ | If the resource calculation is || \ | considered to be a reserve or || | resource. A reserve factors || | economic factors an || | extractability of the deposit || | into account.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Tonnage\ | The total tonnage of the deposit\ || \ | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_AU_GT\ | The average grade of gold in the || \ | deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_AU_OZ\ | The total contained gold, in troy || \ | ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_AG_GT\ | The average grade of silver in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_AG_OZ\ | The total contained silver, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_CU_PCT\ | The average grade of copper in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_CU_LBS\ | The total contained gold, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_MO_PCT\ | The average grade of molybdenum || \ | in the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_MO_LBS\ | The total contained molybdenum, || \ | in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PB_PCT\ | The average grade of lead in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PB_LBS\ | The total contained lead, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_ZN_PCT\ | The average grade of zinc in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_ZN_LBS\ | The total contained zinc, in || \ | pounds\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_NI_PCT\ | The average grade of nickel in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_NI_LBS\ | The total contained nickel, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_CO_PCT\ | The average grade of cobalt in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_CO_LBS\ | The total contained cobalt, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_WO3_PCT\ | The average grade of tungsten || \ | trioxide in the deposit, in || | percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_WO3_LBS\ | The total contained tungsten || \ | trioxide, in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_SN_PCT\ | The average grade of tin in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_SN_LBS\ | The total contained tin, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_SB_PCT\ | The average grade of antimony in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_SB_LBS\ | The total contained antimony, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_FE_PCT\ | The average grade of iron in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_FE_LBS\ | The total contained iron, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PT_GT\ | The average grade of platinum in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PT_OZ\ | The total contained platinum, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PD_GT\ | The average grade of palladium in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PD_OZ\ | The total contained palladium, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_BASO4_PCT\ | The average grade of barium || \ | sulphate in the deposit, in || | percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_BASO4_TONNES\ | The total contained barium || \ | sulphate, in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| REFERENCE_DATE\ | The date of the resource || \ | calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| URL\ | The link to the report or graphic || \ | containing the resource || | calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| LATITUDE_DD\ | Y-Location, geographic center of || \ | zones.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| LONGITUDE_DD\ | X-Location, geographic center of || \ | zones.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca:443/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca:443/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection.For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](http://geomatics.help@yukon.ca:80/)

Reprocessing of magnetic data for Yukon was performed between November 2016 and March 2017. Aeromagnetic data were compiled, data of different resolutions were merged, and a series of images individually levelled for each map sheet were produced. For each 250k-scale map, the following magnetic derivative maps were produced: 1. Residual Total Magnetic Field; 2. Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic Field (RTP); 3. First Vertical Derivative of the Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic Field (RTP_VD); and 4. Tilt Derivative of the Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic Field (RTP_TDR). These maps are provided as pdfs, geotiffs and Geosoft grid files. Colour ramps/legends are provided for each map.