Prospectivity model highlights areas of Canada with the greatest potential for magmatic nickel deposits. The preferred prospectivity model is based on public geological, geochemical, and geophysical datasets that were spatially indexed using the H3 discrete global grid system. Each H3 cell is associated with a prospectivity value, or class probability, calculated from the best-performing gradient boosting machines model. Model results are filtered to include the top 20% of prospectivity values for visualization purposes.

The dataset represents known concentration areas of harvested or unharvested Softshell clam (Mya arenaria) in the intertidal zone of the Estuary and the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Quebec region. The dataset was created for the National environmental emergencies centre (NEEC) for preparation and response in case of an oil spill. Concentration areas were defined using Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) inventories conducted between 2000 and 2020.This layer is dependent on the inventories carried out and thus only represents known clam areas. For example, for the Haute-Côte-Nord, inventories have been limited to areas open to harvesting (with the exception of 4 sectors), but it is known that the Softshell clam is also present outside these areas. In addition, little information was available for the Moyenne and Basse-Côte-Nord.This data layer does not represent the general distribution of the species nor the extent to which fishing is allowed. The extent of shellfish beds may vary over time in response to, among others harvesting and the recruitment rates. The boundaries of polygons from inventory data may be underestimated relative to the actual size of the deposit since the inventories were conducted at the location where the resource is most abundant, without necessarily sampling the entire bed. However, the accuracy is sufficient for the protection and management needs of the resource in the event of an environmental incident. Data sources and references:Brulotte, S. 2011. Évaluation des stocks de mye commune des eaux côtières du Québec. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2011/044. x + 53 p.Brulotte, S. 2018. Évaluation de la mye commune (Mya arenaria) des eaux côtières du Québec en 2016 – méthodologie et résultats. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2018/004. ix + 60 p.Brulotte, S. 2020. Évaluation des stocks de la mye commune (Mya arenaria) des eaux côtières du Québec en 2019 – méthodologie et résultats. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2020/055. vii + 43 p.Brulotte, S. 2022. Résultats des inventaires de gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) réalisés de 2016 à 2020 et mise à jour des résultats de ceux effectués de 2001 à 2014 au Québec. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2022/xxx. (in progress)Brulotte, S. and M. Giguère. 2003. Évaluation d'un gisement de mye commune (Mya arenaria) de l'embouchure de la rivière Mingan, Québec, Rapp. can. ind. sci. halieut. aquat. No. 2511: xi + 58.Brulotte, S., M. Giguère, S. Brillon and F. Bourque. 2006. Évaluation de cinq gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) aux Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Québec, de 2000 à 2003. Rapp. tech. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 2640 : xii + 92 p.Brulotte, S., Giguère, M. and Duluc, C. 2015. Essais de techniques de captage du naissain de mye commune (Mya arenaria) sur la rive nord de l’estuaire et du golfe du Saint-Laurent. Rapp. tech. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 3084 : ix + 60 p.Giguère, M., S. Brulotte and F. Hartog.2007. Évaluation de quelques gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) de la rive sud de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent en 2005 et 2006. Rapp. can. ind. sci. halieut. aquat. No. 2738: xi + 107.Giguère, M., S. Brulotte, M. Boudreau and M.-F. Dréan. 2008. Évaluation de huit gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) de la rive nord de l’estuaire du Saint-Laurent de 2002 à 2008. Rapp. tech. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 2821 : x + 91 p.Roy, I., M. Giguère, S. Brulotte and M. Gagnon. 2003. Évaluation de douze gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) du sud de la Gaspésie, Rapp. Tech. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 2469: xvi + 140 p.

The purpose of this dataset is to provide quantitative analysis on specific commodities, offering insights into:- The total amount of specific commodities, e.g., Gold, in Yukon's hard rock deposits. - The highest-grade and largest deposits in Yukon. - The distribution of mineral resources within multiple zones in a deposit. - Source reports, direct links, and confidence levels for each mineral resource statement. - Differentiation between 43-101, JORC, and historical estimates. The resources in this dataset have been summarized and averaged to show the total geologic resource for a property or zone. For the exact numbers, please refer to the NI 43-101 compliant resource statement.+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Field\ | Description\ || \ | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Property\ | Property for which deposit || \ | resource was calculated.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Zone\ | Zone for which deposit resource || \ | was calculated.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| 43-101 Compliant\ | If the resource calculation is NI || \ | 43-101 compliant, JORC compliant, || | or historic.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Commodities\ | The types of commodities || \ | contained in the resource || | calculation, order is || | alphabetic.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Categories\ | The resource categories used to || \ | create the calculation. This || | indicates the level of certainty || | of the calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Resource / Reserve\ | If the resource calculation is || \ | considered to be a reserve or || | resource. A reserve factors || | economic factors an || | extractability of the deposit || | into account.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Tonnage\ | The total tonnage of the deposit\ || \ | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_AU_GT\ | The average grade of gold in the || \ | deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_AU_OZ\ | The total contained gold, in troy || \ | ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_AG_GT\ | The average grade of silver in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_AG_OZ\ | The total contained silver, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_CU_PCT\ | The average grade of copper in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_CU_LBS\ | The total contained gold, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_MO_PCT\ | The average grade of molybdenum || \ | in the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_MO_LBS\ | The total contained molybdenum, || \ | in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PB_PCT\ | The average grade of lead in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PB_LBS\ | The total contained lead, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_ZN_PCT\ | The average grade of zinc in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_ZN_LBS\ | The total contained zinc, in || \ | pounds\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_NI_PCT\ | The average grade of nickel in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_NI_LBS\ | The total contained nickel, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_CO_PCT\ | The average grade of cobalt in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_CO_LBS\ | The total contained cobalt, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_WO3_PCT\ | The average grade of tungsten || \ | trioxide in the deposit, in || | percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_WO3_LBS\ | The total contained tungsten || \ | trioxide, in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_SN_PCT\ | The average grade of tin in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_SN_LBS\ | The total contained tin, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_SB_PCT\ | The average grade of antimony in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_SB_LBS\ | The total contained antimony, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_FE_PCT\ | The average grade of iron in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_FE_LBS\ | The total contained iron, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PT_GT\ | The average grade of platinum in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PT_OZ\ | The total contained platinum, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PD_GT\ | The average grade of palladium in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PD_OZ\ | The total contained palladium, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_BASO4_PCT\ | The average grade of barium || \ | sulphate in the deposit, in || | percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_BASO4_TONNES\ | The total contained barium || \ | sulphate, in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| REFERENCE_DATE\ | The date of the resource || \ | calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| URL\ | The link to the report or graphic || \ | containing the resource || | calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| LATITUDE_DD\ | Y-Location, geographic center of || \ | zones.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| LONGITUDE_DD\ | X-Location, geographic center of || \ | zones.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca:443/geoyukon)(target="_blank" style="text-decoration:underline;" rel="nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer") by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca:443/maps)(target="_blank" style="text-decoration:underline;" rel="nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer") . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](http://geomatics.help@yukon.ca:80/)(target="_blank" style="text-decoration:underline;" rel="nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer")

The purpose of this dataset is to provide quantitative analysis on specific commodities, offering insights into:- The total amount of specific commodities, e.g., Gold, in Yukon's hard rock deposits. - The highest-grade and largest deposits in Yukon. - The distribution of mineral resources within multiple zones in a deposit. - Source reports, direct links, and confidence levels for each mineral resource statement. - Differentiation between 43-101, JORC, and historical estimates. The resources in this dataset have been summarized and averaged to show the total geologic resource for a property or zone. For the exact numbers, please refer to the NI 43-101 compliant resource statement.+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Field\ | Description\ || \ | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Property\ | Property for which deposit || \ | resource was calculated.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Zone\ | Zone for which deposit resource || \ | was calculated.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| 43-101 Compliant\ | If the resource calculation is NI || \ | 43-101 compliant, JORC compliant, || | or historic.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Commodities\ | The types of commodities || \ | contained in the resource || | calculation, order is || | alphabetic.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Categories\ | The resource categories used to || \ | create the calculation. This || | indicates the level of certainty || | of the calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Resource / Reserve\ | If the resource calculation is || \ | considered to be a reserve or || | resource. A reserve factors || | economic factors an || | extractability of the deposit || | into account.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| Tonnage\ | The total tonnage of the deposit\ || \ | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_AU_GT\ | The average grade of gold in the || \ | deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_AU_OZ\ | The total contained gold, in troy || \ | ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_AG_GT\ | The average grade of silver in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_AG_OZ\ | The total contained silver, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_CU_PCT\ | The average grade of copper in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_CU_LBS\ | The total contained gold, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_MO_PCT\ | The average grade of molybdenum || \ | in the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_MO_LBS\ | The total contained molybdenum, || \ | in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PB_PCT\ | The average grade of lead in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PB_LBS\ | The total contained lead, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_ZN_PCT\ | The average grade of zinc in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_ZN_LBS\ | The total contained zinc, in || \ | pounds\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_NI_PCT\ | The average grade of nickel in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_NI_LBS\ | The total contained nickel, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_CO_PCT\ | The average grade of cobalt in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_CO_LBS\ | The total contained cobalt, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_WO3_PCT\ | The average grade of tungsten || \ | trioxide in the deposit, in || | percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_WO3_LBS\ | The total contained tungsten || \ | trioxide, in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_SN_PCT\ | The average grade of tin in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_SN_LBS\ | The total contained tin, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_SB_PCT\ | The average grade of antimony in || \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_SB_LBS\ | The total contained antimony, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_FE_PCT\ | The average grade of iron in the || \ | deposit, in percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_FE_LBS\ | The total contained iron, in || \ | pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PT_GT\ | The average grade of platinum in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PT_OZ\ | The total contained platinum, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_PD_GT\ | The average grade of palladium in || \ | the deposit, in grams per metric || | tonne.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_PD_OZ\ | The total contained palladium, in || \ | troy ounces.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| AVG_BASO4_PCT\ | The average grade of barium || \ | sulphate in the deposit, in || | percentage.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| TOTAL_BASO4_TONNES\ | The total contained barium || \ | sulphate, in pounds.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| REFERENCE_DATE\ | The date of the resource || \ | calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| URL\ | The link to the report or graphic || \ | containing the resource || | calculation.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| LATITUDE_DD\ | Y-Location, geographic center of || \ | zones.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+| LONGITUDE_DD\ | X-Location, geographic center of || \ | zones.\ || | \ |+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca:443/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca:443/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection.For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](http://geomatics.help@yukon.ca:80/)

GEO - Geological and geophysical (geoscientificInformation)The earth sciences. For example, resources describing geophysical features and processes; minerals; the composition, structure, and origin of the earths rocks; earthquakes; volcanic activity; landslides; gravity information; soils; permafrost; hydrogeology; and erosion

Mineral Occurrence layer with commodity and deposit type attributes. The attribute table contains a URL link to the online Mineral Occurrence database.

This dataset shows the location of the distribution of uranium deposits for the Province of Saskatchewan.This dataset shows the uranium deposits for the Province of Saskatchewan and is designed for the Resource Map of Saskatchewan. Mapping in support of the dataset includes years of field observations which were then compiled and integrated into this dataset. The data was created as a file geodatabase feature class and output for public distribution. **Please Note – All published Saskatchewan Geological Survey datasets, including those available through the Saskatchewan Mining and Petroleum GeoAtlas, are sourced from the Enterprise GIS Data Warehouse.  They are therefore identical and share the same refresh schedule. 

A comprehensive and up-to-date dataset of Mineral Resource Statements, including NI 43-101, JORC, and historic deposits in the Yukon. Resource statements have been grouped and calculations have been made to average and total the tonnage and grade for a property.

The dataset represents known concentration areas of harvested or unharvested Atlantic razor clam (Ensis leei) in the Estuary and the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Quebec Region. It was created for the National Environmental Emergencies Centre (NEEC) for preparation and response purposes in case of an oil spill. Concentration areas were defined using data from Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) inventories, various DFO research projects and commercial fisheries data. This layer is dependent on the inventories carried out and thus only represents the known areas of the Atlantic razor clam. This dataset does not represent the general distribution of the species nor the extent to which fishing is allowed. Most of the information comes from inventories that did not necessarily target this species, therefore its distribution is undoubtedly wider than what is recorded in the layer. In addition, the extent of shellfish beds can change over time in response to, among others, harvesting and recruitment rates. Some beds were mapped based on DFO research project data which were compiled in a benthic biodiversity Access database. Polygons drawn around these data are not precise and may be reviewed. However, the precision is sufficient for the resource protection and management needs in case of an environmental incident. Data sources and references:Anonym. 1991. Analyse de l'échantillonnage en mer des mactres de Stimpson. Programme d'adaptation des pêches de l'Atlantique. Pesca tec International. Pêches et Océans Canada. 134 p.Bernier, L. and L. Poirier. 1979. Évaluation sommaire du stock de mactres de l'Atlantique, Spisula solidissima Dillwyn, des Îles-de-la-Madeleine (golfe du Saint-Laurent). Cahier d'information, ministère de l'Industrie et du Commerce. 42 p.Bourdages, H., P. Goudreau, J. Lambert, L. Landry and C. Nozères. 2012. Distribution des bivalves et gastéropodes benthiques dans les zones infralittorale et circalittorale des côtes de l’estuaire et du nord du golfe du Saint-Laurent. Rapp. tech. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 3004 : iv + 103 p.Bourget, E. and D. Messier. 1983. Macrobenthic density, biomass, and fauna of intertidal and subtidal sand in a Magdalen Islands lagoon, Gulf of St. Lawrence. Can. J. Zool. 61(11):2509-2518.Brulotte, S. Unpublished data. Fisheries and Oceans Canada.Brulotte, S. 2013. Évaluation des stocks de la mactre de l’Atlantique, Spisula solidissima, des eaux côtières des Îles-de-la-Madeleine – méthodologies et résultats. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2013/082: x + 58 p.Brulotte, S. 2016. Évaluation des stocks de mactre de l’Atlantique, Spisula solidissima, des Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Québec en 2015 – méthodologie et résultats. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2016/074. x + 51 p.Brulotte, S., M. Giguère, S. Brillon and F. Bourque. 2006. Évaluation de cinq gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) aux Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Québec, de 2000 à 2003. Rapp. Tech. can. Sci. halieut. Aquat. 2640 : xii + 92 p.DFO. 2013. Assessment of Razor Clam stock in Québec’s Inshore Waters in 2012. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2013/052.Elouard, B, G. Desrosiers, J.C. Brêthes and Y. Vigneault. 1983. Étude de l'habitat du poisson autour des ilots créés par des déblais de dragage; lagune de Grande-Entrée, Îles-de-la-Madeleine. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1209:viii + 69 p.Gendreau, Y. 2018. MS Access database on benthic biodiversity. Fisheries and Oceans Canada.Provencher, L. and C. Nozères. 2011. Protocole de suivi des communautés benthiques de la zone de protection marine Manicouagan. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2011/051:iv +25 p.Thompson, M., D. Drolet and J.H. Himmelman. 2005. Localization of infaunal prey by the sea star Leptasterias polaris. Mar. Biol. 146(5):887-894.

The dataset represents known concentration areas of harvested or unharvested Arctic wedge clam (Mesodesma arctatum) in the Estuary and the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Quebec region. The dataset was created for the National Environmental Emergencies Centre (NEEC) for preparation and response purposes in case of an oil spill. Concentration areas were delimited using Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) inventories conducted between 2000 and 2020 and data from various DFO research projects. For more information on how the data layer was built, see the metadata included in its shapefile (.shp), particularly the “Lineage” section.This layer is dependent on the inventories carried out and thus only represents the known concentration areas of the Arctic wedge clam. It does not represent the general distribution of the species nor the extent to which fishing is allowed. Most of the information comes from inventories that did not necessarily target this species, therefore its distribution is undoubtedly wider than what is recorded in this layer. In addition, the extent of shellfish beds can change over time in response to, among others, harvesting and recruitment rates. Some beds were mapped based on DFO research project data which were compiled in a benthic biodiversity Access database. Polygons drawn around these data are not precise and may be reviewed. The polygons delimited based on inventory data are more precise but might underestimate the concentration areas because sampling was made where the target resource was known to be more abundant without necessarily sampling the entire bed. Nonetheless, the precision is sufficient for resource protection and management needs in case of an environmental incident. Data sources and references:Bourdages, H., P. Goudreau, J. Lambert, L. Landry et C. Nozères. 2012. Distribution des bivalves et gastéropodes benthiques dans les zones infralittorale et circalittorale des côtes de l’estuaire et du nord du golfe du Saint-Laurent. Rapp. tech. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 3004: iv + 103 p.Brulotte, S. Données non-publiées. Pêches et Océans Canada.Brulotte, S. 2011. Évaluation des stocks de mye commune des eaux côtières du Québec. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2011/44: x + 53 p.Brulotte, S. 2012. Évaluation des stocks de buccin des eaux côtières du Québec. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2012/058: xi + 106 p.Brulotte, S. et M. Giguère. 2003. Évaluation d'un gisement de mye commune (Mya arenaria) de l'embouchure de la rivière Mingan, Québec, Rapp. can. ind. sci. halieut. aquat. No. 2511: xi + 58.Gendreau, Y. 2018. MS Access database on benthic biodiversity. Fisheries and Oceans Canada.Giguère, M., S. Brulotte et F. Hartog.2007. Évaluation de quelques gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) de la rive sud de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent en 2005 et 2006. Rapp. can. ind. sci. halieut. aquat. No. 2738: xi + 107.Giguère, M., S. Brulotte, M. Boudreau et M.-F. Dréan. 2008. Évaluation de huit gisements de mye commune (Mya arenaria) de la rive nord de l’estuaire du Saint-Laurent de 2002 à 2008. Rapp. tech. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 2821 : x + 91 p.Provencher, L. Unpublished data. Fisheries and Oceans Canada.Provencher, L. et C. Nozères. 2011. Protocole de suivi des communautés benthiques de la zone de protection marine Manicouagan. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech. 2011/051:iv +25 p.