This web experience includes four dashboards and graphs that show inspections, the most common food safety violations, and the levels of progressive compliance measures taken by health officers to enforce the law.1. Inspections: This dashboard includes tables showing inspection data collected by the Food Safety and Inspection Directorate over the past five years. <o:p></o:p>Inspection Violations — Overview (arcgis.com) 2. Food safety violations: This dashboard shows the number of violations observed during the years indicated. The number of violations observed is then classified into the category of critical or non-critical offenses. Critical violations are violations that present an immediate risk to food safety and must be corrected within a specified period of time. Non-critical violations do not present an immediate food safety risk but need to be addressed before they become one. <o:p></o:p>Inspection Violations — Overview (arcgis.com) 3. Top five food safety violations: This dashboard shows charts and tables showing the five most common food safety violations observed during inspections. Each type of violation refers to the Manitoba Food Regulations. The five most common violations are expressed as a percentage of all observed food safety violations. <o:p></o:p>Main offences<o:p></o:p> 4. Progressive compliance measures: This dashboard shows how often health officers applied progressive compliance measures to food processing establishments that did not correct food safety violations within the time frame specified in the inspection. The dashboard explains that food processing establishments have a certain amount of time to correct food safety violations based on the risk associated with them. Progressive compliance measures are only applied if the violation is not corrected within the prescribed timeframe. Progressive compliance measures<o:p></o:p>**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

Summary of recent disciplinary action and related information regarding non-compliant matters that have been brought before the Executive Director of Alcohol, Gaming, Fuel and Tobacco Division resulting in issuance of a Notice of Proposed Action. Sanctions for similar infractions may vary in length according to the specifics of each case.

Displays the levels of escalating enforcement applied by health officers to enforce the Manitoba Food and Food Handling Establishment Regulations when food safety violations are not corrected in the prescribed period of timeThis table displays the frequency in which health officers applied escalating levels of enforcement to food processors who did not correct food safety violations in the prescribed amount of time indicated in the inspection. Food processors are given a period of time to correct food safety violations based on the associated risk to food safety. Escalating enforcement is only applied if the violation is not corrected in the prescribed period of time. This table was created by the Food Safety and Inspection Branch - Agriculture and Resource Development department.Field Names (Field Alias): Field description. Period (Period):The period for which the data was collected. Either quarterly or yearly. Year (Year): The specific year of the previously mentioned data collection period. Date (Date): The dates of the calendar year in which the data was collected during a period. Enforcement_Type (Enforcement Type): The individual levels of escalating enforcement applied by health officers. The values for this field are "Warning letter", "Verbal warning", "Offence notice issued", "Closure orders issued", "Suspensions", "Products seized and destroyed", "Products seized and held". Total (Total): the number of occurrences a level of escalating enforcement was applied in a period.

Most of these events involved community evacuations, significant structural loss and/or involvement of a Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Emergency Response Officer. Events include those assigned to MNR by an Order-In-Council under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act as well as events where MNR provided requested emergency response assistance. These events fall into one of ten type categories: * dam failure * drought /low water * erosion * flood * forest fire * soil and bedrock instability * Petroleum Resource Center event * EMO requested assistance * continuity of operations event * other requested assistance This product requires the use of geographic information system (GIS) software.

TA_CROWN_REV_SHARE_AGRMNTS_SVW contains the spatial representation (polygon) of active and applied for Crown Land Revenue Sharing Agreements. A Revenue Sharing Agreement is made between the crown and one or more parties to share revenue. The view was created to provide a simplified presentation of this single tenure type from the disposition information in the Tantalis operational system. The same content could be derived from the TA_CROWN_TENURES_SVW by filtering to this tenure type only. It’s possible that this dataset may contain few or no records, depending on the current number of active tenures or applications.

Acoustic telemetry allows detailed observations of the movement behaviour of many species and as tags get smaller, smaller organisms may be tagged. The number of studies using acoustic telemetry to evaluate marine invertebrate movement is growing, but novel attachment methods include unknowns about the effects of tagging procedures on individual survival and behaviour. This study compared methods of tag attachment on green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) to determine the feasibility of using acoustic transmitters to track echinoid movement. Four tagging methods were compared in the lab and tag retention, urchin condition, and survival analysed. Two tagging methods (Dyneema® fishing line and T-bar tags) were evaluated in the field using an existing acoustic telemetry array. Urchins were tagged and the study area revisited one week and 2 months post-release by scuba divers to estimate movement and tag retention. The best methods in the lab, with high tag retention, survival, and minimal effects on urchin condition, were fishing line methods. T-bar tags, although showing high tag retention, caused significant mortality and had deleterious long-term effects on urchin condition and behaviour. After 2 months in the field, as in the lab, fishing line was a more effective tagging method. Urchins tagged with fishing line showed increased estimates of space occupancy compared to T-bar-tagged urchins and a single fishing-line tagged individual was found by divers in good health after 80 days. Combined, these laboratory and field results demonstrate the feasibility of using acoustic telemetry to observe urchin movement. Results strongly suggest that surgical attachment methods that minimize injuries at the attachment site should be prioritized for echinoid tagging studies. Together, lab and field tests indicate that acoustic telemetry is a promising method to examine marine echinoid movement over ecologically relevant spatial and temporal scales.The data available includes the laboratory data (tag retention, survival, diameter, wet weight, gonad weight and condition/righting time) and the field data (metadata and acoustic telemetry detections for tagged individuals, results of diver searches and 2-day estimates of movement measured in the field). Data from the laboratory experiment and diver observations in the field have been verified and undergone a control for quality. Acoustic telemetry detections are raw detection files (unfiltered); see the published article for a description of how the data were treated for analyses (https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-022-00309-8).

Main road structures such as bridges and interchangers.attributes:ID - Unique identifierSubtype - Item subtypeName - Name of the road structure**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

Moored instrument time series data include current velocity, temperature, salinity, oxygen, fluorescence, transmissivity, turbidity, sediment trap data and particle capture of carbon, nitrogen, and silicon.These data were collected by researchers from the Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, BC, from locations in the North Pacific.The data links below are only a representative sample of the entire collection. If you require more data, please send your request to the data contact.

Correctional Facilities is a point dataset identifying correctional facilities in British Columbia.

Location of timestampers.attributs:ID - Unique IdentifierNo - Number**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**